Difference between revisions of "BioControl (2001) 46, 229-260"
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 309: | Line 309: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Beneficial record | {{Beneficial record | ||
| − | |Beneficial=Pyrenophora chaetomioides | + | |Beneficial=Pyrenophora chaetomioides (weed pathogen) |
|Pest=Avena fatua (weed) | |Pest=Avena fatua (weed) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 366: | Line 366: | ||
{{Beneficial record | {{Beneficial record | ||
|Beneficial=Cercospora piaropi (weed pathogen) | |Beneficial=Cercospora piaropi (weed pathogen) | ||
| − | |Pest= | + | |Pest=Pontederia crassipes (weed) |
}} | }} | ||
{{Beneficial record | {{Beneficial record | ||
| − | |Beneficial= | + | |Beneficial=Colletotrichum graminicola (weed pathogen) |
|Pest=Echinochloa crus-galli (weed) | |Pest=Echinochloa crus-galli (weed) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Beneficial record | {{Beneficial record | ||
| − | |Beneficial= | + | |Beneficial=Colletotrichum graminicola (weed pathogen) |
|Pest=Rottboellia cochinchinensis (weed) | |Pest=Rottboellia cochinchinensis (weed) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 385: | Line 385: | ||
{{Beneficial record | {{Beneficial record | ||
|Beneficial=Alternaria eichhorniae (weed pathogen) | |Beneficial=Alternaria eichhorniae (weed pathogen) | ||
| − | |Pest= | + | |Pest=Pontederia crassipes (weed) |
}} | }} | ||
{{Beneficial record | {{Beneficial record | ||
| Line 476: | Line 476: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Beneficial record | {{Beneficial record | ||
| − | |Beneficial= | + | |Beneficial=Fusarium nygamai (weed pathogen) |
|Pest=Striga hermonthica (weed) | |Pest=Striga hermonthica (weed) | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:00, 25 May 2023
R. Charudattan (2001)
Biological control of weeds by means of plant pathogens: Significance for integrated weed management in modern agro-ecology
BioControl 46 (2), 229-260
Abstract: Biological control of weeds by using plant pathogens has gained acceptance as a practical, safe, environmentally beneficial, weed management method applicable to agro-ecosystems. The interest in this weed control approach from public and private groups, and support for research and developmental effort, are on the upswing. This increasing interest is stimulated largely due to major economic, social, and environmental forces that are directing our choices in crop production practices. Some of these changes are market-driven while others are social and ecological in nature. These changes are in turn influencing the choices in weed control methods. In this regard, biocontrol with plant pathogens has been proven a feasible, albeit minor, component of modern integrated weed-management systems. This environmentally beneficial method should be promoted and exploited further to meet the current and future challenges in weed management in agro-ecosystems.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Link to article at publishers website
Database assignments for author(s): Raghavan Charudattan
Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
biocontrol - natural enemies
Research topic(s) for beneficials or antagonists:
review
