Weed Science (2007) 55, 386-397

From Pestinfo-Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Chris Parker, Barney P. Caton and Larry Fowler (2007)
Ranking nonindigenous weed species by their potential to invade the United States
Weed Science 55 (4), 386-397
Abstract: Because of the large number of potentially invasive species, and the time required to complete weed risk assessments (WRAs) with the use of the current, mandated system in the United States, species need to be prioritized for assessment and possible listing as Federal Noxious Weeds. Our objective was to rank the potential invasiveness of weedy or pest plant species not yet naturalized in the United States. We created a new model of invasiveness (hereafter the U.S. weed-ranking model) based on scoring factors within four elements: (1) invasiveness potential, or likelihood to exhibit invasive behavior; (2) geographic potential, or habitat suitability; (3) damage potential, or likely impact; and (4) entry potential, or likelihood to be introduced. The ranking score was the product of the four elements. We scored 250 species satisfactorily, from a list of 700 +. We analyzed model sensitivity to scoring factors, and compared results to those from a WRA model for Hawaii. For species not in cultivation in the United States, the top 25 species included a mix of annuals, perennials, sedges, shrubs, and trees. Most had exhibited invasive behavior in at least several other countries. Because of greater entry potential scores, the highest-scoring species were weeds in cultivation. Twenty-nine such species, out of 44 total, had scores greater than the highest scoring species not in cultivation. In comparison to the Hawaii WRA model, correlation and regression analyses indicated that the U.S. weed-ranking model produced similar, but not exact, results. The ranking model differs from other WRAs in the inclusion of entry potential and the use of a multiplicative approach, which better suited our objectives and United States regulations. Two highly ranked species have recently been listed as Federal Noxious Weeds, and we expect most top-tier species to be similarly assessed.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Link to article at publishers website
Database assignments for author(s): Barney P. Caton

Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
quarantine treatments/regulations/aspects


Pest and/or beneficial records:

Beneficial Pest/Disease/Weed Crop/Product Country Quarant.


Chrysanthemoides monilifera (weed)
Sagittaria pygmaea (weed)
Ligustrum robustum (weed)
Campuloclinium macrocephalum (weed)
Impatiens parviflora (weed)
Limnocharis flava (weed)
Hakea sericea (weed)
Senecio inaequidens (weed)
Rubus alceifolius (weed)
Lygodium flexuosum (weed)
Cyperus flavidus (weed)
Desmostachya bipinnata (weed)
Crassula helmsii (weed)
Ludwigia hyssopifolia (weed)
Hiptage benghalensis (weed)
Isachne globosa (weed)
Echinochloa pyramidalis (weed)
Actinoscirpus grossus (weed)
Hakea salicifolia (weed)
Wikstroemia indica (weed)
Cestrum laevigatum (weed)
Cyperus aromaticus (weed)
Gomphrena celosioides (weed)
Cyanotis axillaris (weed)
Ischaemum muticum (weed)
Potamogeton distinctus (weed)
Cyperus exaltatus (weed)
Acroceras zizanioides (weed)
Tarchonanthus camphoratus (weed)