Parasites and Vectors (2021) 14 (515) - Australian mosquito

From Pestinfo-Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Boni F. Sebayang, Tanya L. Russell, Kyran M. Staunton, Michael Townsend, Christopher Paton, Tovi Lehmann and Thomas R. Burkot (2021)
Australian mosquito assemblages vary between ground and sub-canopy habitats
Parasites and Vectors 14 (515)
Abstract:
Background
The surveillance and control of mosquito-borne diseases is dependent upon understanding the bionomics and distribution of the vectors. Most studies of mosquito assemblages describe species abundance, richness and composition close to the ground defined often by only one sampling method. In this study, we assessed Australian mosquito species near the ground and in the sub-canopy using two traps baited with a variety of lures.
Methods
Mosquitoes were sampled using a 4 × 4 Latin square design at the Cattana Wetlands, Australia from February to April 2020, using passive box traps with octenol and carbon dioxide and three variations of a sticky net trap (unbaited, and baited with octenol or octenol and carbon dioxide). The traps were deployed at two different heights: ground level (< 1 m above the ground) and sub-canopy level (6 m above the ground).
Results
In total, 27 mosquito species were identified across the ground and sub-canopy levels from the different traps. The abundance of mosquitoes at the ground level was twofold greater than at the sub-canopy level. While the species richness at ground and sub-canopy levels was not significantly different, species abundance varied by the collection height.
Conclusions
The composition of mosquito population assemblages was correlated with the trap types and heights at which they were deployed. Coquillettidia species, which prefer feeding on birds, were mainly found in the sub-canopy whereas Anopheles farauti, Aedes vigilax and Mansonia uniformis, which have a preference for feeding on large mammals, were predominantly found near the ground. In addition to trap height, environmental factors and mosquito bionomic characteristics (e.g. larval habitat, resting behaviour and host blood preferences) may explain the vertical distribution of mosquitoes. This information is useful to better understand how vectors may acquire and transmit pathogens to hosts living at different heights.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Full text of article
Database assignments for author(s): Tanya L. Russell, Tovi Lehmann, Thomas R. Burkot

Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
environment - cropping system/rotation
surveys/sampling/distribution


Pest and/or beneficial records:

Beneficial Pest/Disease/Weed Crop/Product Country Quarant.


Culex gelidus Australia (NT+QLD)
Culex gelidus Australia (NT+QLD)
Culex annulirostris Australia (NT+QLD)
Aedes notoscriptus Australia (NT+QLD)
Verrallina funerea Australia (NT+QLD)
Aedes vigilax Australia (NT+QLD)
Aedes alternans Australia (NT+QLD)
Culex sitiens Australia (NT+QLD)
Anopheles farauti Australia (NT+QLD)
Mansonia uniformis Australia (NT+QLD)
Aedes tremulus Australia (NT+QLD)
Verrallina lineata Australia (NT+QLD)
Aedes kochi Australia (NT+QLD)
Coquillettidia xanthogaster Australia (NT+QLD)
Verrallina carmenti Australia (NT+QLD)
Mansonia septempunctata Australia (NT+QLD)