Journal of Nematology (2021) 53 (102)

From Pestinfo-Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Raquel Campos-Herrera, Ignacio Vicente-Díez, Magda Galeano, Maryam Chelkha, María del Mar González-Trujillo, Miguel Puelles, David Labarga, Alicia Pou, Javier Calvo and José Eduardo Belda (2021)
Intraspecific virulence of entomopathogenic nematodes against the pests Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)
Journal of Nematology 53 (102)
Abstract: Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are excellent biocontrol agents against various insect pests. Novel biotechnological approaches can enhance their utility against insects above-ground, opening a new venue for selecting superior EPN against certain insects. We hypothesize that different populations of the same species but from different origins (habitat, ecoregion) will differ in their virulence. This study aimed to evaluate the virulence of various EPN populations against two pests of worldwide incidence and damage to high value crops: Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). We tested 10 EPN populations belonging to three EPN species: Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Koppert, MG-618b, AM-203, RM-102), Steinernema feltiae (Koppert, RS-5, AM-25, RM-107), and Steinernema carpocapsae (Koppert, MG-596a). Each EPN population was tested at two concentrations. Frankliniella occidentalis was tested at 160 and 80 IJs/cm2 and T. absoluta at 21 and 4 IJs/cm2. Control treatments followed the same experimental procedure but only adding distilled water. Overall, whenever different, higher IJs concentration resulted in lower adult emergence, higher larval mortality, and shorter time to kill the insects. Considering the low concentration, S. feltiae provided the best results for both insects and instars investigated, while H. bacteriophora and S. carpocapsae required a high concentration to reach similar or slightly better results. Differences among populations of each of the species were detected, but only the native populations of H. bacteriophora populations showed consistently higher control values against both insects/instar compared with the commercial one. Differences among S. feltiae and S. carpocapsae populations depended on the IJs concentration, insect, and instar. We consider S. feltiae a very promising species for their application against F. occidentalis and T. absoluta, with the Koppert population as the most consistent among the populations tested. Specific EPN-populations of S. carpocapsae and H. bacteriophora were good candidates against certain instar/insects at high concentrations. This study emphasized the importance of intraspecific variability for EPN virulence.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Full text of article


Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
biocontrol - natural enemies
Research topic(s) for beneficials or antagonists:
evaluation - screening - selection
general biology - morphology - evolution


Pest and/or beneficial records:

Beneficial Pest/Disease/Weed Crop/Product Country Quarant.


Frankliniella occidentalis Spain (continental)
Phthorimaea absoluta Spain (continental)
Steinernema carpocapsae/Xenorhabdus nematophila (entomopathogen) Frankliniella occidentalis Switzerland
Steinernema feltiae/Xenorhabdus bovienii (entomopathogen) Portugal (continental)
Steinernema feltiae/Xenorhabdus bovienii (entomopathogen) Switzerland
Steinernema feltiae/Xenorhabdus bovienii (entomopathogen) Phthorimaea absoluta Spain (continental)
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora/Photorhabdus (entomopathogen) Portugal (continental)
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora/Photorhabdus (entomopathogen) Switzerland
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora/Photorhabdus (entomopathogen) Phthorimaea absoluta Spain (continental)