Difference between revisions of "Pesticide Science (1997) 51, 419-428"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
− | |Publication authors=Nilima Prabhaker, Nick C. Toscano, [[Steven J. Castle]] and Thomas J. Henneberry | + | |Publication authors=[[Nilima Prabhaker]], Nick C. Toscano, [[Steven J. Castle]] and Thomas J. Henneberry |
− | |Author Page=Steven J. Castle | + | |Author Page=Steven J. Castle, Nilima Prabhaker |
|Publication date=1997 | |Publication date=1997 | ||
|dc:title=Selection for imidacloprid resistance in silverleaf whiteflies from the Imperial Valley and development of a hydroponic bioassay for resistance monitoring | |dc:title=Selection for imidacloprid resistance in silverleaf whiteflies from the Imperial Valley and development of a hydroponic bioassay for resistance monitoring |
Latest revision as of 22:10, 10 January 2020
Nilima Prabhaker, Nick C. Toscano, Steven J. Castle and Thomas J. Henneberry (1997)
Selection for imidacloprid resistance in silverleaf whiteflies from the Imperial Valley and development of a hydroponic bioassay for resistance monitoring
Pesticide Science 51 (4), 419-428
Abstract: A field-collected population of the silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii, was selected with the nicotinyl compound, imidacloprid, over 32 generations to determine if resistance would develop when maintained under continuous selection pressure in a greenhouse. Resistance was slow to increase at first with low to moderate levels of resistance (RR from 6- to 17-fold) in the first 15 generations of selection. Further selection steadily led to higher levels of resistance, with the greatest resistance ratio at 82-fold, the gradual rise suggesting the involvement of a polygenic system. At the end of the selection, slopes of probit regressions were substantially steeper than earlier, indicating increased homogeneity of imidacloprid resistance in this strain.
A hydroponic bioassay featuring systemic uptake of imidacloprid through roots was developed to monitor the changes in resistance to imidacloprid in the selected whitefly strain and in seven field-collected strains from Imperial Valley, California. Six out of seven field-collected strains exhibited low LC50 values (0·002 to 0·512 mg ml-1) compared to the selected resistant strain, with one exception where the LC50 was 0·926 mg ml-1 (RR=15·0). Variation in responses to imidacloprid in the field strains suggest that this technique is sufficiently sensitive to detect differences in susceptibilities of whitefly populations. The imidacloprid-resistant strain showed no cross-resistance to endosulfan, chlorpyrifos or methomyl (RR ranging from 0·4- to 1·5-fold). A low level of cross-resistance was observed to bifenthrin in the IM-R strain at 7-fold. The success of selection for resistance to imidacloprid has serious implications for whitefly control programs that rely heavily on imidacloprid.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Database assignments for author(s): Steven J. Castle, Nilima Prabhaker
Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
pesticide resistance of pest
Pest and/or beneficial records:
Beneficial | Pest/Disease/Weed | Crop/Product | Country | Quarant.
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Bemisia tabaci biotype MEAM1 | U.S.A. (SW) |