Weed Science (2000) 48, 645-652

From Pestinfo-Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Rex Millhollon (2000)
Loose kernel smut for biocontrol of Sorghum halepense in Saccharum sp. hybrids
Weed Science 48 (5), 645-652
Abstract: Sporisorium cruentum teliospores and sporidia (cultured from teliospores with about 30-fold spore increase) caused about equal, although variable, levels of smut infection of individual Sorghum halepense plants when applied to the foliage. Teliospores were applied in a water-surfactant suspension (106 spores ml−1) at 935 L ha−1 and sporidia in a water-in-oil invert emulsion (about 107 spores ml−1) at 468 L ha−1. In crop interference studies, a single foliar application of teliospores to space-planted S. halepense plants in a first-year crop of Saccharum sp. hybrids caused about 55% infection (at least one smutted panicle per plant) but did not reduce the level of S. halepense infestation or substantially improve Saccharum yield compared to noninoculated plants. Smutted panicles usually appeared 30 to 60 d after the foliar treatment, but many culms on a plant produced only healthy panicles. Two applications of teliospores, either 7 d apart in one experiment or 1 yr apart in another, significantly increased (P = 0.05) smut infection over one application but generally did not improve Saccharum yield substantially over plots infested with noninoculated S. halepense. In contrast to foliar spray inoculation, S. halepense plants injected with teliospores in the seedling stage prior to transplanting to the field were 98% infected with smut and were much less competitive with the crop than noninoculated transplants. In host range studies using several S. bicolor genotypes injected with teliospores in the greenhouse, the ratios of resistant to susceptible were 17 to 2 for grain types and 16 to 5, with 2 intermediate, for forage types, showing that genotypes have a relatively high level of resistance to the disease. The result of these experiments indicate that loose kernel smut has potential as a biocontrol agent for S. halepense, but only if infection by foliar treatment can be improved to levels at least comparable to injection.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Link to article at publishers website


Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
biocontrol - natural enemies
Research topic(s) for beneficials or antagonists:
application technology
evaluation - screening - selection


Pest and/or beneficial records:

Beneficial Pest/Disease/Weed Crop/Product Country Quarant.


Sorghum halepense (weed) Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)
Sporisorium cruentum (weed pathogen) Sorghum halepense (weed) Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)