Environmental Entomology (1997) 26, 142-149
Michael J. Costello and Kent M. Daane (1997)
Comparison of sampling methods used to estimate spider (Araneae) species abundance and composition in grape vineyards
Environmental Entomology 26 (2), 142-149
Abstract: The effectiveness of 3 methods for sampling spiders in grape vineyards was tested. The sampling methods were as follows: (1) a drop-cloth method in which spiders were dislodged from a 5.1-m2 area of grapevine onto a drop cloth, (2) a funnel method in which spiders were dislodged into a 0.74-m2 funnel, and (3) a D-vac method in which 50 sections of grapevine (30-cm sections, total area of 5.4 m2) were suctioned with a gasoline-powered vacuum. Data from all sampling methods were adjusted for area sampled and compared with an absolute control, in which foliage from an entire vine was removed and searched for spiders. Analyses were made on the following 8 most abundant spider species: Anyphaena pacifica Banks, Metaphidippus vitis (Cockerell), Theridion dilutum Levi and Theridion melanurum Hahn (grouped as Theridion spp.), Cheiracanthium inclusum (Hentz), Hololena nedra Chamberlin and Ivie, Trachelas pacificus (Chamberlin and Ivie), and Erigone dentosa (O.P. Cambridge). Mean spider abundance from each sampling method differed significantly from the absolute control in (>1) soecies. The funnel method often overestimated spider abundance while the drop-cloth and D-vac methods often underestimated spider abundance. Estimates of spider species composition were most accurately measured by the drop-cloth method and were significantly altered by the D-vac method. We tested 3 data transformations (ln [x +1], V [x + 0.5], and x1-b/2) to stabilize the variance and satisfy the requirements of analysis of variance (ANOVA). No single transformation uncoupled the mean and variance for all spider species over the 3 sampling methods. Using mean and variance of mean spider abundance , sample size and dispersion parameters were created by way of the Taylor power law. Sample sizes were determined for each sampling method; estimates of sample size and sampling costs varied considerably among spider species and sampling methods. All but 1 spider species collected with the drop-cloth method had a clumped distribution, the funnel method produced variable dispersion indexes, and all spider species collected with the D-vac method had a random distribution pattern. Whereas no single sampling method was best for all spider species, the funnel method is favored because of its efficiency in estimating spider densities and its reduced cost.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Database assignments for author(s): Kent M. Daane, Michael J. Costello
Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
biocontrol - natural enemies
Research topic(s) for beneficials or antagonists:
surveys/distribution/isolation
population dynamics/epizootiology
Pest and/or beneficial records:
| Beneficial | Pest/Disease/Weed | Crop/Product | Country | Quarant.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metaphidippus vitis (predator) | ||||
| Hololena nedra (predator) | ||||
| Trachelas pacificus (predator) | ||||
| Anyphaena pacifica (predator) | ||||
| Theridion dilutum (predator) | ||||
| Theridion melanurum (predator) | ||||
| Cheiracanthium inclusum (predator) | ||||
| Erigone dentosa (predator) |
