Difference between revisions of "BioControl (2015) 60, 795-803"
From Pestinfo-Wiki
(command-line import) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
| − | |Publication authors=Catherine Gacheri, Thomas Kigen and Lene Sigsgaard | + | |Publication authors=Catherine Gacheri, Thomas Kigen and [[Lene Sigsgaard]] |
| + | |Author Page=Lene Sigsgaard | ||
|Publication date=2015 | |Publication date=2015 | ||
|dc:title=Hot-spot application of biocontrol agents to replace pesticides in large scale commercial rose farms in Kenya | |dc:title=Hot-spot application of biocontrol agents to replace pesticides in large scale commercial rose farms in Kenya | ||
Latest revision as of 09:20, 27 June 2016
 | Selected publication you are invited to contribute to the discussion section (above tab) |
Hot-spot application of biocontrol agents to replace pesticides in large scale commercial rose farms in Kenya
BioControl 60 (6), 795-803
Abstract: Rose (Rosa hybrida L.) is the most important ornamental crop in Kenya, with huge investments in pest management. We provide the first full-scale, replicated experiment comparing cost and yield of conventional two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) control with hot-spot applications of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseidae) in large commercial rose greenhouses. Hot-spot treatments replaced acaricides except at high infestations and the two treatments were applied in seven greenhouses each. With the conventional treatment, acaricides were applied when T. urticae populations exceeded 250 motile individuals per plant based on scouting. Treatments with acaricides and P. persimilis were guided by weekly scouting and hot-spot treated greenhouses with infestations exceeding 1000 individuals m-2 (calculated as average mites/leaflet × average leaflets per plant) were first blanket-treated with an acaricide to decrease infestations. Roses subjected to the hot-spot treatment had significantly lower T. urticae infestations compared with conventionally treated roses. In addition, significantly fewer high spider mite infestations were recorded in roses with the hot-spot treatment. The cost of pest management was significantly lower in the hot-spot-treated greenhouses than in the conventional treatment. However, there was no significant difference in the number of harvested stems from the two treatments. It can therefore be concluded that acaricides can be replaced by P. persimilis hot-spot treatments in commercial cut rose production, effectively reducing pest management costs with no loss in crop yield.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Link to article at publishers website
Database assignments for author(s): Lene Sigsgaard
Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
biocontrol - natural enemies
Research topic(s) for beneficials or antagonists:
application technology
Pest and/or beneficial records:
| Beneficial | Pest/Disease/Weed | Crop/Product | Country | Quarant. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetranychus urticae | Rosa (crop) | Kenya | ||
| Phytoseiulus persimilis (predator) | Tetranychus urticae | Rosa (crop) | Kenya |
