Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2018) 115, E7863-E7870
of interest to a wider audience. We would welcome
contributions to the Discussion section (above tab) of this article.
Remember to log in or register (top right corner) before editing pages.
Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (33), E7863-E7870
Abstract: The idea that noncrop habitat enhances pest control and represents a win–win opportunity to conserve biodiversity and bolster yields has emerged as an agroecological paradigm. However, while noncrop habitat in landscapes surrounding farms sometimes benefits pest predators, natural enemy responses remain heterogeneous across studies and effects on pests are inconclusive. The observed heterogeneity in species responses to noncrop habitat may be biological in origin or could result from variation in how habitat and biocontrol are measured. Here, we use a pest-control database encompassing 132 studies and 6,759 sites worldwide to model natural enemy and pest abundances, predation rates, and crop damage as a function of landscape composition. Our results showed that although landscape composition explained significant variation within studies, pest and enemy abundances, predation rates, crop damage, and yields each exhibited different responses across studies, sometimes increasing and sometimes decreasing in landscapes with more noncrop habitat but overall showing no consistent trend. Thus, models that used landscape-composition variables to predict pest-control dynamics demonstrated little potential to explain variation across studies, though prediction did improve when comparing studies with similar crop and landscape features. Overall, our work shows that surrounding noncrop habitat does not consistently improve pest management, meaning habitat conservation may bolster production in some systems and depress yields in others. Future efforts to develop tools that inform farmers when habitat conservation truly represents a win–win would benefit from increased understanding of how landscape effects are modulated by local farm management and the biology of pests and their enemies.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Full text of article
Database assignments for author(s): Wopke van der Werf, Felix J.J.A. Bianchi, Michael J. Brewer, Alejandro C. Costamagna, Gina Marie Angelella, Nicolas Desneux, Yves Carriere, Nancy A. Schellhorn, Lynn S. Adler, Berta Caballero-López, Jay A. Rosenheim, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Claudio Gratton, Ashley E. Larsen, Mattias Jonsson, Teja Tscharntke, Aaron Iverson, Audrey Alignier, Riccardo Bommarco, Klaus Birkhofer, F.J. Frank van Veen, Thomas Frank, Vesna Gagic, Peter B. Goodell, Geoff M. Gurr, Anders S. Huseth, Gregg A. Johnson, Tamar Keasar, Blas Lavandero, Heidi Liere, Kevi C. Mace, Filipe Madeira, Anne Marie Cortesero, Lorenzo Marini, Holly M. Martinson, Gonzalo A.R. Molina, Matthew E. O'Neal, Michael A. Nash, Örjan Östman, Hazel R. Parry, Stacy M. Philpott, Xavier Pons, David W. Ragsdale, Lucie Raymond, Gudrun Schneider, Sonja Stutz, Zsofia Szendrei, Linda J. Thomson, Kris A.G. Wyckhuys
Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
environment - cropping system/rotation
Pest and/or beneficial records: