Plant Disease (2018) 102, 1189-1217
of interest to a wider audience. We would welcome
contributions to the Discussion section (above tab) of this article.
Remember to log in or register (top right corner) before editing pages.
Grapevine trunk diseases: A review of fifteen years of trials for their control with chemicals and biocontrol agents
Plant Disease 102 (7), 1189-1217
Abstract: Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) represent one of the most important problems for viticulture worldwide. Beyond the original causes of this outbreak in some countries like France, the lack of efficient control protocols and the prohibition of using active ingredients such as sodium arsenite and benzimidazoles, until recently used to reduce the impact of some GTDs but deleterious for humans and the environment, have probably worsened the impact of the diseases, leading to increasing economic losses. Since 1990, searches have been made to find efficient tools to control GTDs, testing a wide range of active ingredients and biocontrol agents. This review provides readers with an overview of the results reported in the scientific literature over the last 15 years. In particular, the review focuses on the trials carried out applying chemicals or microorganisms to control Esca complex diseases, Botryosphaeria dieback, and Eutypa dieback, the most widespread GTDs.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Full text of article
Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
control - general
Pest and/or beneficial records:
|Lasiodiplodia theobromae||Grapevine (Vitis)|
|Eutypa lata||Grapevine (Vitis)|
|Diplodia mutila||Grapevine (Vitis)|
|Phaeomoniella chlamydospora||Grapevine (Vitis)|
|Phaeoacremonium minimum||Grapevine (Vitis)|
|Diplodia seriata||Grapevine (Vitis)|
|Neofusicoccum parvum||Grapevine (Vitis)|