Pyricularia oryzae

From PestinfoWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Literature database
1068 articles sorted by:
year (recent ones first)
research topics
host plants
list of antagonists
Pyricularia oryzae A) sporulation on sterile barley seed on SNA, B–G) conidiophores and conidia, H) conidia (click on image to enlarge it)
Author(s): S. Klaubauf, D. Tharreau, E. Fournier, J.Z. Groenewald, P.W. Crous, R.P. de Vries and M.-H. Lebrun
Source: Studies in Mycology, 2014, 79, p. 113

Pyricularia oryza Cavara, 1891

The fungus causes rice blast (Oryza pathotype), a very important disease in many rice growing regions. It infects also a variety of other graminaceous hosts (e.g. it causes gray leaf spot on turf grass, perennial ryegrass pathotype). Furthermore, it has become an important pathogen of wheat in South America (wheat blast, Triticum pathotype) where it causes yield losses of up to 70%. It should be further noted that from southern Brazil, another Pyricularia species (P. graminis-tritici) has been described that infects wheat, barley, oat and other grasses, but not rice.

The fungus is believed to have a South-East Asian origin, but is now distributed in warmer and tropical regions around the world. On rice, mainly the leaves are infected and show typical diamond-shaped lesions. Panicles and leaf collars may also show symptoms. Spore production might start as soon as a week after the infection.

Vernacular names
• Deutsch: Reisbrand
• English: rice blast
gray leaf spot of grasses
slow-blasting of rice
wheat blast
neck blast of rice
• Español: anublo del arroz
• Français: brûlure du riz

Conidia are usually three-celled and spindle or club-shaped with a length of around 25-30 µm. They are dispersed by rain splashes or wind. Sexual spores (ascospores) are only known from laboratory cutures. The fungus can persist and overwinter in the environment in infected plant residues.

Resistant varieties have been developed, but resistance breakdown is common. Crop rotation and avoiding the overuse of nitrogen fertilizers are recommended as additional management options. The use of fungicides is usually not economical and is considered as a control option of last resort.

For a review see Tosa and Chuma, 2014.

Taxonomic notes:
The scientific name for the rice blast fungus has changed repeatedly over the years causing considerable confusion among plant pathologists.

  1. The fungus was originally called Pyricularia grisea (Sacc.) Sacc. 1880.
  2. When the teleomorph form was described as Magnaporthe grisea (T.T. Hebert) M.E. Barr 1977 that name was used because according to the taxonomic rules of that time, the sexual name should be preferred over the anamorph name.
  3. In 2002 Couch and Kohn pointed out that the name used for the rice blast fungus is incorrect because the species Pyricularia grisea only infects grasses of the genus Digitaria, whereas the fungus named Pyricularia oryzae Cavara 1891 infects rice and that both fungi are separate valid species. Both names had been actually used correctly for some time based mainly on the hosts from where they were isolated. However, since there were no clear morphological differences between both species they were subsequently considered synonyms with the older name (Pyricularia grisea) being preferred. By studying the DNA structure of both species Couch and Kohn demonstrated that they were indeed different. The sexual form of Pyricularia oryzae was then named Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, 2002 and that name was subsequently used for the rice blast fungus, although it took more than 5 years for most plant pathologists to adopt that change.
  4. In 2013 the taxonomic rules for fungi were changed to what is known as "one-fungus-one-name" and now only one name, the older one, is valid for each species, irrespective of whether the name applies to a sexual or asexual form. Therefore, Pyricularia oryzae is the valid name for the rice blast fungus and Magnaporthe oryzae a junior synonym.
  5. The new rules apply to species names as well as to genus names. Based on molecular re-examinations by several groups of taxonomists (see Luoa and Zhang 2013, Murata et al. 2014 and Klaubauf et al. 2014) it was concluded that the genera Pyricularia and Magnaporthe are clearly different and both are currently placed in different families. Pyricularia is defined by the type species Pyricularia grisea. Magnaporthe is defined by its type species Magnaporthe salvinii, which has now become a junior synonym of the asexual form Nakataea oryzae (see Luoa and Zhang 2013). Therefore, the name Magnaporthe has become a junior synonym of Nakataea.