Agricultural and Forest Entomology (2013) 15, 272-284

From Pestinfo-Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
People icon1.svgSelected publication
of interest to a wider audience. We would welcome
contributions to the Discussion section (above tab) of this article.
Remember to log in or register (top right corner) before editing pages.
Andrew Paul Gutierrez and Luigi Ponti (2013)
Deconstructing the control of the spotted alfalfa aphid Therioaphis maculata
Agricultural and Forest Entomology 15 (3), 272-284
Abstract: The control of insect pests and other taxa may be a result of many factors that are difficult to separate and quantify. Introduced parasitoids, host plant resistance, pathogens and native predators led to the successful control of the spotted alfalfa aphid (SAA; Therioaphis maculata Monell) in California and elsewhere, although the relative contribution of each factor remained largely unknown.
The relative contribution of each control factor was estimated using a weather-driven physiologically-based demographic system model consisting of alfalfa, SAA, its three exotic parasitoids [Aphelinus semiflavus Howard, Praon palitans Muesebeck and Trioxys complanatus (Quilis)], a native coccinellid beetle [Hippodamia convergens (Guérin-Menéville)], a fungal pathogen [Erynia neoaphidis Remaudière and Hennebert (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales)] and host plant resistance (HPR). Daily weather data for the period 1995-2006 from 142 locations in Arizona and California were used to drive the model.
The factors were introduced to the model singly or in combination to assess their effects in suppressing simulated SAA populations using SAA-days m−2 year−1 (i.e. density) as the metric of control.
Data from selected runs were mapped using the geographic information system grass (http://grass.osgeo.org). The simulation data across all factor combinations, years and locations were summarized using linear multiple regression, with the dependent variable being log10 SAA-days m−2 year−1 and the independent variables being the presence-absence (0, 1) of the various factors and their interactions. Marginal analysis of the regression model (delta-y/delta-xi) enabled separation of the average effects of the different factors (xi) given the average effects of the other factors.
Alone, each factor failed to control SAA, as did combinations of the parasitoids and coccinellid predation. Control was predicted across all ecological zones only when all mortality factors were included. The marginal analysis suggests that the order of importance of the mortality factors is HPR > coccinellid beetles > T. complanatus > P. palitans > A. semiflavus > the fungal pathogen. The variability of control by coccinellid beetles and the fungal pathogen was high and hence unreliable.
(The abstract is excluded from the Creative Commons licence and has been copied with permission by the publisher.)
Link to article at publishers website


Database assignments for author(s): Andrew Paul Gutierrez

Research topic(s) for pests/diseases/weeds:
biocontrol - natural enemies
population dynamics/ epidemiology
Research topic(s) for beneficials or antagonists:
population dynamics/epizootiology


Pest and/or beneficial records:

Beneficial Pest/Disease/Weed Crop/Product Country Quarant.
Therioaphis trifolii U.S.A. (SW)
Trioxys complanatus (parasitoid) Therioaphis trifolii U.S.A. (SW)
Hippodamia convergens (predator) Therioaphis trifolii U.S.A. (SW)
Aphelinus semiflavus (parasitoid) Therioaphis trifolii U.S.A. (SW)
Pandora neoaphidis (entomopathogen) Therioaphis trifolii U.S.A. (SW)
Praon exsoletum (parasitoid) Therioaphis trifolii U.S.A. (SW)